De-extinction: the scientific possibility and ethical implication of resurrecting extinct species

De-extinction: the scientific possibility and ethical implication of resurrecting extinct species

Have you ever wondered if it’s possible to bring extinct animals back to life? This might sound like something straight out of a science fiction movie, but it is a question that has been prodding the minds of scientists for quite some time now. Let’s dive into this intriguing topic.

De-extinction: science fiction or reality?

De-extinction, as the process is called, involves using genetic engineering to recreate the extinct species. The first step in the process is to extract preserved DNA from specimens of the animal – a task that is easier said than done, since DNA degrades over time and may be contaminated by bacteria or fungi. The extracted DNA is then sequenced and compared with the DNA of a closely related living species. The data is then used to form an edited genome of the extinct species, which is implanted into an egg cell of the surrogate species. If all goes according to plan, the surrogate will give birth to a member of the extinct species. As fascinating as it may sound, the process does have a fair share of controversies and debates surrounding it.

The ethical considerations

There are certainly pros and cons to be weighed when it comes to de-extinction. On the plus side, resurrecting extinct species could potentially enhance biodiversity, rectify past wrongs caused by human activities and offer opportunities for scientific discovery. But on the flip side, when it comes to the ethics of de-extinction, several questions arise.

See also :   Decoding stress in hamsters: signs and solutions

The legal and moral perspective

The existing laws and regulations may not be suited to govern the resurrected species and there may be difficulties in identifying suitable habitats for them. There is also the risk of the reemergence of diseases that were specific to the extinct animals. Morally, it’s worth questioning whether it’s right to recreate a species only for it to live in a world that’s immensely different from the one it was adapted to?

The ecological viewpoint

Besides, the conservation resources spent on de-extinction can be diverted towards protecting endangered species and their habitats. After all, prevention is always better than cure.

We are living in a world where the physical boundaries of science are constantly being pushed. As much as de-extinction stirs up marvel and fascination, it is a topic that must be approached with due sensitivity and responsibility. It’s not just a question of whether we can bring back extinct species but whether we should. It is clear that our duties towards animals extend beyond caring for the ones we share our homes with and encompass all creatures, past and present. Our actions today have far-reaching impacts and it is important to make choices that are informed and compassionate, thereby giving every life the respect and value it deserves.

Leave a Comment